A True Expert

نویسنده

  • Yossi Feinberg
چکیده

We suggest a test for discovering whether a potential expert is informed of the distribution of a stochastic process. In a non-Bayesian non-parametric setting, the expert is asked to make a prediction which is tested against a single realization of the stochastic process. It is shown that by asking the expert to predict a “small” set of sequences, the test will assure that any informed expert can pass the test with probability one with respect to the actual distribution. Moreover, for the uninformed non-expert it is impossible to pass this test, in the sense that for any choice of a “small” set of sequences, only a “small” set of measures will assign a positive probability to the given set. Hence for “most” measures, the non-expert will surely fail the test. We define small as category 1 sets, described in more detail in the paper. JEL Classification: D83, C14, C50 ∗We would like to thank Alvaro Sandroni, Eilon Solan and Bob Wilson for helpful comments. The first author gratefully acknowledges the support of the NSF. The second author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Center for Electronic Business and Commerce. †Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA and Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. e-mail: [email protected] ‡Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford CA 94305-5015. e-mail: [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On comparison of non-Bayesian experts

An expert, trying to assess the true distribution over the states of nature, is associated with a preference relation over utility bundles. He prefers f to g if he believes that, according to the true distribution, the expected utility of f is greater than that of g. Expert I is said to be more knowledgeable than expert II (Lefort [7]) if, between the two experts, it is always beneficial to fol...

متن کامل

Logic and Fuzzy Relations

It is introduced an approach to the problem of "building logics" over sets of facts with only structured by a fuzzy relation of "consequence". Notions of "Truth" and "Falsehood" are introduced by means of two generalizations for classical Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens. Studying this concepts a theoretical base to explain the mode of reasoning in expert systems is obtained. By studying fuzzy tr...

متن کامل

Minimum Information Updating with Specified Marginals in Probabilistic Expert Systems

A probability-updating method in probabilistic expert systems is considered in this paper based on the minimum discrimination information. Here, newly acquired information is taken as the latest true marginal probabilities, not as newly observed data with the same weight as previous data. Posterior probabilities are obtained by updating prior probabilities subject to the latest true marginals. ...

متن کامل

Higher ABCD2 score predicts patients most likely to have true transient ischemic attack.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Some patients diagnosed with transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the emergency department may actually have alternative diagnoses such as seizure, migraine, or other nonvascular spells. The ABCD2 score has been shown to predict subsequent risk of stroke in patients with TIA diagnosed by emergency physicians, but perhaps high ABCD2 scores simply separate those patients with...

متن کامل

No . 1957 Testing Multiple Forecasters

We consider a cross-calibration test of predictions by multiple potential experts in a stochastic environment. This test checks whether each expert is calibrated conditional on the predictions made by other experts. We show that this test is good in the sense that a true expert—one informed of the true distribution of the process—is guaranteed to pass the test no matter what the other potential...

متن کامل

Testing Multiple Forecasters∗

We consider a cross-calibration test of predictions by multiple potential experts in a stochastic environment. This test checks whether each expert is calibrated conditional on the predictions made by other experts. We show that this test is good in the sense that a true expert—one informed of the true distribution of the process—is guaranteed to pass the test no matter what the other potential...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004